In response to claims of British media bias by Max Verstappen and Adrian Newey, Martin Brundle has defended Sky F1’s coverage, stating that it is “pretty balanced.” Brundle, a former F1 driver and prominent Sky F1 commentator since 2012, has become an iconic figure in British Formula 1 broadcasting. These accusations of bias come after Newey, the former Red Bull design lead, and Verstappen voiced concerns about British media favoritism, particularly in its coverage of British drivers.

Adrian Newey and Verstappen’s Media Bias Claims

Speaking on the High Performance Podcast, Adrian Newey, who will join Aston Martin in 2025, labeled Sky F1 coverage as “nationalistic.” He noted that Max Verstappen and Sebastian Vettel faced “demonization” in the British press, attributing it to a British bias that he believes casts non-British champions in a negative light. Verstappen echoed Newey’s sentiments, agreeing “100 percent” and even took a jab at the British press following his Brazilian Grand Prix win, asking why no British journalists attended the post-race press conference.

Martin Brundle Defends Sky F1’s Objectivity

On the Sky F1 podcast, Brundle refuted the bias claims, arguing that Sky F1 coverage maintains a fair stance. Responding to host Matt Baker’s suggestion that Sky might give more detail on British drivers’ stories, Brundle stated, “No, I don’t think we do.” He acknowledged Sky’s primary audience is British, yet emphasized that Sky strives for neutrality.

“I like to think we’re pretty balanced. I really do,” Brundle said. “We’re nothing like… when I watch the Olympics or the World Cup, where the commentary is fervently pro-country. And actually, we get flack from pretty much everybody.”

Brundle’s Experience in F1 Commentary

With nearly three decades in F1 broadcasting, Brundle shared that he often faces criticism, noting that one negative comment can overshadow a thousand positive ones. While he admits that compliments are rare from drivers, 2016 World Champion Nico Rosberg once thanked him, albeit humorously confessing that his mother told him to.

Brundle’s rebuttal underlines Sky F1’s commitment to global viewership and balance in coverage, despite focusing on British drivers when relevant. As Sky F1 remains influential worldwide, Brundle’s defense reinforces its intention to present the sport impartially, while reflecting the interests of its audience.

In this ongoing debate about British media bias in F1, Brundle’s response underscores the complexities of sports broadcasting and its impact on driver perceptions across different national audiences.